In an attempt to meet the educational standards of the No Child Left Behind Act, many schools have reduced or eliminated recess; this trend has caused a lot of protest. Hear both sides of the debate and consider alternate options.
People have often debated how the time of children is best
spent. Should children work? Should children study? Should children play? In
developed countries, the general consensus is that children should study and
play. However, the most beneficial ratio of time spent playing to time spent
studying is still hotly debated. In recent years, as many elementary schools
have reduced or eliminated recess, this debate has grown even more intense.
Why Recess is Being Cut
According to the National
Center for Educational Statistics,
26 percent of high school seniors had writing levels that were below basic in
2002. Also in 2002, 25 percent of eighth graders had reading levels below
basic. In 2000, 34 percent of eighth graders had math levels below basic.
Minority students and students who live in lower class areas are most likely to
have inadequate reading, writing, and math skills.
In an attempt to rectify this problem, President George W.
Bush signed the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) act on January 8, 2002. The NCLB act forces schools to be
accountable for the quality of education that they provide. Specifically,
students must take and pass standardized tests to prove that they have learned
the basic English and math skills appropriate for their grade level. Schools
that do not show significant improvement, according to test score results, will
be required to provide supplemental services, such as tutoring. Students will
also be given the option to attend better performing schools.
Although the NCLB act does not suggest that schools cut or
reduce recess, this has been a common reaction. Schools are under a great deal
to meet the standards set forth by the NCLB act; additional class time is
sometimes seen as imperative, and recess is the easiest program to cut.
Additionally, recess often raises concerns over safety.
According to the Children’s Safety Network, most injuries to young students
occur on the playground. This makes sense; recess is unstructured and often under
supervised. During recess, children play, often quite recklessly, on large,
tall pieces of equipment, such as slides, swings, and monkey bars. Bullying also frequently occurs on playgrounds. Physical
education classes offer a safer environment in which children can exercise,
leading some school officials to believe that cutting recess is a good option.
Where Recess Cuts Are Occurring
According to the American Association for the Child’s Right
to Play, 40 percent of schools in the US
are reducing or eliminating recess or considering recess cuts. For example, Creighton
Elementary School in Phoenix
Arizona, elementary schools in Clark
Country School District
in Nevada, and elementary schools
in the Tacoma School
District in Washington
have all cut or eliminated recess. New elementary schools in Atlanta,
Georgia have even been
built without playgrounds.
Backlash Against Recess Cuts
The backlash against recess cuts has been phenomenal. The
fight against recess cuts is not new; however, the recent trend towards recess
cuts has caused the protest to increase considerably.
In 1961, the International Association for the Child’s Right
to play formed in Denmark.
As the name suggests, the association’s goal is to ensure that children retain
the right to playtime; the association adamantly advocates the need for recess.
The American Association for the Child’s Right to Play formed in 1973. In 1989, the United Nations’ Convention of
the Right of the Child adopted Article 31, which states that children have the
right to rest, leisure, play, and recreational activities. This article is
often used by the International and American Associations for the Child’s Right
to Play in order to support recess. Other organizations, including the National
Association of Early Childhood Specialists in State Departments of Education,
have taken a pro-recess stance as well.
Some states have made efforts to mandate recess. In the Georgia
General Assembly, House Bill 1013, which would make recess obligatory, has been
proposed. Likewise, the Parent Teacher Association of Washington’s Tacoma
School District has released a
Proposed Recess Policy that calls for mandatory recess. The actions in Georgia
and in Tacoma were both in response
to local recess cuts.
In other states, attempts to mandate recess have already
been successful. Connecticut has passed
a bill mandating recess. In 2000, Michigan’s
State Board of Education released the Policies for Creating Effective Learning
Environments; this policy mandates daily recess or a period of physical
activity for elementary and middle school children.
The Benefits of Recess
The backlash against recess cuts has been based on several
benefits that recess offers. Childhood obesity is a growing problem. According
to the Surgeon General, number of adolescents who are overweight has tripled in
the past two decades. The Surgeon General recommends that children get at least
sixty minutes of physical activity on most days of the week.
Although physical education classes do provide children with
an opportunity to exercise, most children will not get enough exercise from
physical education classes alone. Additionally, many children do not have the
facilities, time, or motivation to exercise after school. Recess can provide
children with the extra exercise they need.
In addition to preventing obesity, exercising during recess
may also help students pay attention during class. In 1993, Pelligrini and
Davis published the results of a study on the effects of recess on classroom
behavior. The results showed that many students build up excess energy and may
become fidgety and unable to concentrate during class when denied the
opportunity to exercise during recess. Additionally, the California Department
of Education conducted a study that showed that children who are physically
active score higher on the Stanford Achievement Test. If this is true, then
schools that are cutting recess in order to increase class time and raise
standardized test scores may actually be doing more harm than good.
The unstructured nature of recess has its benefits, too.
During recess, children are able to interact with each other without the
strictness imposed during class time. Children have to create their own rules
and customs in order to get along. As a result, they learn important social
skills, such as patience, communication, and sharing, and they learn to use
these skills without an adult telling them to do so. Although students do
occasionally get hurt during recess, most injuries are minor.
Finally, another benefit to recess is simply that it
provides children with a chance to play. Children are children, and they like
to play; many of the best childhood memories involve recess. Even without the
health and developmental benefits, recess could still be considered worthwhile.
Other Solutions
Although some schools still consider recess cuts necessary,
more and more school officials are deciding that recess cuts are not a viable
solution. However, improvements in education still need to be made. If extra
class time is deemed necessary, but that time cannot come from recess cuts, it
will have to come from somewhere else. Some schools have cut physical
education, art, and music programs. In some cases, even history and science are
cut in favor of English and math, which are the two most frequently tested
subjects on standardized tests. However, cutting these classes usually draws at
least as much protest as cutting recess. If no classes can be cut, schools
could increase the length of school day, but this is likely to draw protest as
well.
Instead of focusing on the quantity of class time, schools
could focus on the quality of class time. This would require improved training
for teachers and improved curriculums. Some states have already upped their
requirements for teaching certificates in order to provide a more efficient
education for students. For example, as of 2003, teaching preparation programs
in Washington must adequately
cover pedagogy (teaching methods); Washington
is considering adding a pedagogy assessment to the current basic skills
assessment and subject assessments that teachers must pass in order to be
certified.